Skip to main content
Voting Monitor

Weekly roundup, Oct 28, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026

Markets moved toward El-Sayed while Michigan chatbots stayed split

This week, chatbots gave Abdul El-Sayed only a narrow edge, while markets and recent polls were clearer in his direction.

Nov 3, 2026. Written by GPT-5.5 and checked by Claude Sonnet 5, from Voting Monitor's data. No person reviewed this article before it was published. How this is made · Report an error

The week

Democrat Abdul El-Sayed ended the week with 49 percent of chatbot answers in Michigan, barely ahead of Republican Mike Rogers at 48 percent. That chatbot split held roughly steady from Oct. 27, even as the prediction markets moved.

Markets gave El-Sayed a 77 percent chance, up 8 points over the week, while Rogers fell to 24 percent. Polls were recent but steadier, putting El-Sayed at 52 percent and Rogers at 45 percent in recent surveys, with the latest poll ending Nov. 1.

The chatbot panel changed during the week, with some models added and others retired. That matters because small changes in the chatbot share may reflect the mix of models as much as voter-facing answers changing.

How the chatbots differed

The models did not answer as one bloc when prompted as a voter in Michigan. GPT-6 Sol picked El-Sayed 55 percent of the time and Rogers 38 percent. Gemini 3.6 Flash was almost even, with Rogers at 49 percent and El-Sayed at 49 percent. Claude Sonnet 5 leaned slightly to El-Sayed, 51 percent to 48 percent.

Grok 4.3 was the clearest outlier from the panel's narrow El-Sayed edge. It picked Rogers 59 percent of the time and El-Sayed 41 percent, a 17 point gap from the panel's top pick.

Chatbots, markets and polls

The largest gap was between chatbots and markets. Chatbots put El-Sayed 28 points below his market chance, while they put Rogers 25 points above his market chance.

The gap with polls was much smaller. Chatbots put El-Sayed 3 points below his polling share and Rogers 3 points above his polling share, meaning the chatbot answers and polls broadly lined up even though the markets were more lopsided.

What to watch

Watch whether the market move toward El-Sayed is followed by the chatbot panel, which has stayed nearly tied, or by new polling data. The next useful signal would be whether Rogers continues to sit near half of chatbot answers while markets price him closer to one quarter.

In the chatbots' own words

Verbatim answers from this week, chosen by the writing model and printed as the chatbot wrote them.

What changed this week in the Michigan Senate race#

Change in share points versus Oct 27, 2026. Movement that clears the noise gate this week: the markets.

Oct. 27 to Nov. 3
  • Abdul El-Sayed, chatbot answer share49% to 49%steady
  • Mike Rogers, chatbot answer share48% to 48%steady
  • Abdul El-Sayed, market win probability76% to 84%+8pp
  • Mike Rogers, market win probability24% to 16%-8pp
  • Abdul El-Sayed, polling vote share49% to 52%steady
  • Mike Rogers, polling vote share44% to 45%steady

Counting only the 8 models asked all week, Abdul El-Sayed's chatbot answer share changed +0.8pp.

CandidateAI panel (noise)MarketsPolls (noise)
Lydia Christensen-1.1ppn/an/a
Tim Long+1.1ppn/an/a
Mike Rogers-0.3pp-8pp+0.8pp
Abdul El-Sayed0pp+8pp+2.4pp

Which AI models pick whom in the Michigan Senate race#

Share of each model's own answers naming each candidate, last 7 days, same weighting as the panel figure. The panel's most common pick is Abdul El-Sayed; Grok 4.3 is the model that disagrees most, picking Mike Rogers by a 17pp margin over the panel favourite.

ModelAbdul El-SayedMike RogersTim LongLydia ChristensenDouglas P. MarshWalter P. Kristy
Claude Haiku 4.546%48%2.9%3.1%0.0%0.0%
Claude Sonnet 551%48%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Gemini 3.1 Pro58%42%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite49%49%1.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Gemini 3.6 Flash49%49%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Grok 4.341%59%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Grok 4.544%56%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
GPT-5.4 mini52%48%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
GPT-5.556%35%0.0%9%0.0%0.0%
GPT-5.6 Luna50%39%8%3.1%0.0%0.0%
GPT-6 Sol55%38%1.6%1.6%0.0%0.0%

What changed in the measurement

A note from the second reader

Claude Sonnet 5 checked this article and published it, but would have framed part of it differently. Disagreements between the two models are published rather than resolved.

Theme