Skip to main content
Voting Monitor

Weekly roundup, Oct 23, 2026 to Oct 29, 2026

Betting markets narrow on Hinson in Iowa Senate race as chatbots barely move

Over the past week, prediction markets shifted away from Republican Ashley Hinson while chatbot answers held close to even and polls stayed put.

Oct 29, 2026. Written by Claude Sonnet 5 and checked by GPT-5.5, from Voting Monitor's data. No person reviewed this article before it was published. How this is made · Report an error

What moved this week

The notable change this week came from the betting markets, not the chatbots. Markets now give Republican Ashley Hinson a 53 percent chance against Democrat Josh Turek, a shift of 6 points away from her since October 22, the only movement in any lens large enough to call a change.

Chatbot answers barely budged. Asked as a voter in Iowa, the panel split close to evenly between Hinson and Turek, with Libertarian Thomas Laehn picking up a small amount of ground in chatbot answers, not enough on its own to call a trend.

Polls did not move at all this week. The three most recent surveys, the latest from co/efficient with a field end of October 19, still show Hinson and Turek within a point of each other.

Where the chatbots differ

The chatbot panel's top pick overall is Turek, but the products disagree sharply on how close that is. Grok 4.3 stands out as the outlier, putting Hinson 25 points ahead of the panel's pick, a gap wider than any other product shows.

The split often traces to which issue a voter asks about. GPT-5.5 named Hinson on border enforcement and public safety but picked Turek on healthcare, while Gemini 3.1 Pro pointed to Turek's position on public school funding as a reason to favor him there. Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash both named Laehn when asked about public safety or foreign policy, citing his record as a county prosecutor and his noninterventionist stance.

Chatbots versus markets and polls

The chatbots and the betting markets disagree by a wide margin on Hinson. Chatbot answers put her near 41 percent of answers, 11 points below where markets price her chance of winning, even after markets moved away from her this week.

Against the polls, the lenses are closer. Chatbot shares for Hinson and Turek each sit within about 5 points of their poll numbers. Laehn is the exception, running 11 points higher in chatbot answers than his 5 percent poll share, with some chatbots naming him on noninterventionist foreign policy or expanding legal immigration.

What to watch next week

Watch whether the betting markets' move away from Hinson holds or reverses as the November 3 general election nears. This week, the market shifted while chatbot shares and polls held roughly steady, leaving a clear gap between what the markets price and what chatbots tell a voter asking about this race.

In the chatbots' own words

Verbatim answers from this week, chosen by the writing model and printed as the chatbot wrote them.

What changed this week in the Iowa Senate race#

Change in share points versus Oct 22, 2026. Movement that clears the noise gate this week: the markets.

CandidateAI panel (noise)MarketsPolls (noise)
Thomas Laehn+2.1ppn/a0pp
Josh Turek-1.6pp+5pp0pp
Ashley Hinson-0.6pp-6pp0pp

Which AI models pick whom in the Iowa Senate race#

Share of each model's own answers naming each candidate, last 7 days, same weighting as the panel figure. The panel's most common pick is Josh Turek; Grok 4.3 is the model that disagrees most, picking Ashley Hinson by a 25pp margin over the panel favourite.

ModelJosh TurekAshley HinsonThomas Laehn
Claude Haiku 4.534%53%3.1%
Claude Sonnet 547%31%22%
Gemini 3.1 Pro50%44%6%
Gemini 3.6 Flash38%47%16%
Grok 4.338%63%0.0%
Grok 4.538%50%13%
GPT-5.4 mini50%50%0.0%
GPT-5.550%17%33%